Cited by 392Geological and Geochemical AnalysisGeochemistry and Elemental AnalysisHigh-pressure geophysics and materials

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

The Relationship between Fluids in Some Fresh Alpine-Type Ultramafics and Possible Modern Serpentinization, Western United States

BARNES, IVAN, O'NEIL, JAMES R.·1969·Geological Society of America Bulletin

Abstract

Research Article| October 01, 1969 The Relationship between Fluids in Some Fresh Alpine-Type Ultramafics and Possible Modern Serpentinization, Western United States IVAN BARNES; IVAN BARNES U.S. Geological Survey, Menlo Park, California Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar JAMES R O'NEIL JAMES R O'NEIL U.S. Geological Survey, Menlo Park, California Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Author and Article Information IVAN BARNES U.S. Geological Survey, Menlo Park, California JAMES R O'NEIL U.S. Geological Survey, Menlo Park, California Publisher: Geological Society of America Received: 11 Nov 1968 Revision Received: 17 Mar 1969 First Online: 02 Mar 2017 Online ISSN: 1943-2674 Print ISSN: 0016-7606 Copyright © 1969, The Geological Society of America, Inc. Copyright is not claimed on any material prepared by U.S. government employees within the scope of their employment. GSA Bulletin (1969) 80 (10): 1947–1960. https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(1969)80[1947:TRBFIS]2.0.CO;2 Article history Received: 11 Nov 1968 Revision Received: 17 Mar 1969 First Online: 02 Mar 2017 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Search Site Citation IVAN BARNES, JAMES R O'NEIL; The Relationship between Fluids in Some Fresh Alpine-Type Ultramafics and Possible Modern Serpentinization, Western United States. GSA Bulletin 1969;; 80 (10): 1947–1960. doi: https://doi.org/10…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1130/0016-7606(1969)80[1947:trbfis]2.0.co;2

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

Cited by 392

Metadata

Authors
BARNES, I., & O'NEIL, J. R.
Affiliations
United States Geological Survey (US)
Venue
Geological Society of America Bulletin
Published
1969
Volume
80
Issue
10
Pages
1947
ISSN
0016-7606 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2011626356
Cited by
392
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 13
FWCI
3.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Geological Society of America Bulletin (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geochemistry and Petrology › Geological and Geochemical Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geochemistry and Petrology › Geochemistry and Elemental Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › High-pressure geophysics and materials
Keywords
serpentinization, ultramafic rocks, fluids, serpentine, periclase, olivine, American West, Colorado, Colorado River Basin, Great Basin, San Andreas fault zone, San Francisco Bay Area

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review